0 votes
by (360 points)

So now we all know the entire technique of bitcoin functioning and the way Bitcoins can be utilized for making all kinds of real transactions. Bitcoins are exchangeable for fiat forex via cryptocurrency exchanges and can be utilized to make purchases from merchants and retailers that settle for them. Greg Sanders: Yeah, if I can soar in. Mark Erhardt: So I’m wondering, one among the problems that seems to leap out when i hear you speaking about that is, what if one facet retains making updates but not concluding it? And we’ve at all times gone again and forth between those, because we don’t know if we must always do a less complicated model first and anticipate later to do a way more complicated version, or if we should always just bounce to the more complicated model right now. Because we’ve at all times been discussing the truth that saying, having the channel announcement level to a selected onchain output, was fairly unhealthy for privacy and that we might in all probability do better. So, these are things that we’ve always been simply hand-wavy about how we'd do this sooner or later. Read More: Amid worth drops and increased regulation, what’s the future of cryptocurrenc
p>

But I don’t suppose we’ll mean you can have any sort of multiplier, as a result of one of the opposite ideas was that you might also just announce some UTXOs that you simply own, with the proof that you simply personal them, with a complete value of, for instance, 2 bitcoin, and then that will grant you the flexibility to announce up to X occasions that in channels with out having to point to any specific onchain output. I didn’t think it was too bad, but the one key difference right redirected here is that for the fee channels with penalties as at the moment designed, it’s necessitating that you retailer these secret nonces forever until channel close. These charts are cardinal part of the entire affair as with them traders are in a position to predict the motion near accuracy. But, realizing that the markets by no means close is a useful safeguard to have. You probably have another Lightning-like channel specification that you coded up or a customized channel sort, you can also include that on this channel announcement and it will simply work. That’s why we’re not doing that right now, and that’s why most individuals will just keep saying the output that actually corresponds to the channel in order that when it gets spent, people really notice it and may take away it from that graph and know that they can't route through that channel
more.


I think we’re going to follow a easy version, the place you permit pointing to any kind of output to pay for your channel. PTLC fixes that by ensuring that as a substitute of utilizing the preimage of a SHA256 hash and its hash, we’re going to use elliptic curve points and their personal keys. This could seem pointless given that BIP32 already offers prolonged personal keys (xprvs) that may be shared between signing wallets. Maybe we will start with t-bast. Can the channel stay open when the UTXO gets spent? And then again, how do you ensure that the identical UTXO shouldn't be reused for the announcement; and what occurs if that UTXO gets spent? So, will we should be preserving monitor of the UTXO really not being moved while it's the stand-in to have introduced the channel? Mike Schmidt: The taproot and MuSig2 channel dialogue considerably leads into the up to date channel announcement dialogue and the way gossip protocol would need to be upgraded with a view to help moving to P2TR outputs. So, we need to alter that, because we want to permit taproot, which suggests permitting additionally input, particularly if we use MuSig2; we don’t want to reveal the in
or keys.


And proper now, it’s going to make use of the same fee hash with all these nodes, which signifies that if someone owns two of the nodes in the path, they are studying data, and that is bad for privateness. Right now, whenever you send a payment, this payment goes to go through a number of nodes on the network. Bastien Teinturier: Sure. So right now, after we announced the channel on the network, we explicitly introduced node IDs and the Bitcoin keys which are contained in the multisig 2-of-2, and folks verified that the output that we're referencing is definitely locked with the script hash of multisig 2-of-2 of these two keys, so you can solely use it with scripts that basically comply with the format of Lightning channels with out taproot. Mike Schmidt: Murch or t-bast, another feedback on taproot and MuSig2 channels? Mike Schmidt: Go ahead, Murch. Mike Schmidt: Next section from the Summit discussed PTLCs and redundant overpayments. Bastien Teinturier: Okay, so PTLCs are a change that is allowed by taproot and adaptor signatures.

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Welcome to FluencyCheck, where you can ask language questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...