0 votes
by (760 points)

Too usually somebody is disparaged in their youthful passions by some self-styled wizened sage declaring, "You do not know what love is!" And the humorous thing is, despite the fact that the youth and the sage have probably used that word thousands of times of their lives, they can not agree what it means. There's a basic problem here, and it isn't just an embittered codger jealously dismissing that which his heart earnestly yearns for. It's the fluidity of that means of the word 'love' itself. Some phrases like 'set' have a dozen separate meanings which could be pieced out by context. But there isn't clear context to separate out the time period 'love' since all meanings are tied to emotions and affection. Worse, even in case you attempt to subdivide things down into the ideas of eros, agape, and philos, we nonetheless debate over who's in eros and who is not. One theory is that "no phrase ever has exactly the identical meaning twice", as is put forth in Language in Thought in Action.


Same-sex marriage in MassachusettsBut that solely occurs by levels. If phrases aren't at the least slightly concrete, for a short while, we might by no means talk to each other at all as a result of my set would never mean the same as your set. And my love by no means may very well be the identical as your love. There must be some foundation for settlement on the time period love so we can discuss meaningfully about it. And so that expressing love is meaningful. One may say issues are muddled because that is an try and intellectually pin down an emotional concept. But the meaning of different feelings is not nearly as unclear. Take joy, lacking someone, and even hating someone. Have you ever ever doubted the sincerity of somebody's hate? Love is a snowmobile racing throughout the tundra after which all of a sudden it flips over, pinning you beneath. At evening, the ice weasels come. It has been a little bit of a difficulty recently, as I've felt compelled in a number of conditions to comment on things utilizing such emotionally-charged phrases as compassion, time period life insurance, and love.


Preview of Snooki's sex tape. (SFW)I don't use such phrases flippantly because, even when we won't agree on what one another means after we say them, everyone knows they will enormously modify behavior when they're used. I know you can't prescribe meaning for words, particularly such universal ones. But I'd like to supply my view on this one. Love is an impulse built on behavior. After an accumulation of positive, emotionally-charged experiences with the identical thing or person, ideas of that factor outcome immediately, thoughtless second of joy. Love shouldn't be an emotion a lot as a skilled response. It matches infatuation which can but develop; it matches lengthy-time period romantic love; it matches parents' adoration for their infants; it matches (at least some) familial love. It matches the entire ideals in my head, so I can use it once i know it is needed and really feel I'm being honest. And, perhaps most frighteningly, it gives a litmus take a look at for falling out of love.


Do you hesitate before you smile? Then you're now not in love. Ron Burgundy: Brick, are you simply looking at issues in the workplace and saying that you love them? Brick Tamland: I love lamp. Ron: Do you actually love the lamp, or are you simply saying it because you saw it? Brick: I love lamp! It's a humorous factor when you could have phrases swimming in your head, and you're rearranging your entire belief system in high school. You by no means know the place these ideas might leak out. There was only one particular person I had the privilege of explaining this to carefully once i distinctly felt the emotion. The goal of my affection, being of the particular bent that could both tolerate my lengthy, meandering explanations and respect my need to logically analyze one thing that most took as simply because it comes, kissed me. Most others, I worry, would interpret a definition reminiscent of this as a redefinition of the terms of our association, and a negative one at that. It is not that I'm in love. That's been an extended while. But I ponder generally what I'm being told when somebody says love. Normally, I just smile. For sex all my need for evaluation, I can still be thoughtlessly completely happy for a second, being loved.  C᠎on tent has  be en created ᠎by GSA᠎ Content  Generat​or​ Demover sion​.

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Welcome to FluencyCheck, where you can ask language questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...