Don’t forget your free lemonade stand toolkit! We’re not mailing out the GoFundMe Lemonade stand toolkit, but you possibly can nonetheless host your stand! We’ll reply with personalised, downloadable property that can help deliver your stand to life and make it easy in your prospects to donate. When outreaching, please include the link to your GoFundMe fundraiser. StandForSomething Lemonade Stand Toolkit kind to obtain your family’s very own toolkit. If submissions are acquired by GoFundMe before 3 p.m. Pacific on August 30, 2022, GoFundMe and VistaPrint will make all reasonable efforts to send the toolkit by the start of Labor Day weekend. Otherwise, please enable 3-5 business days for it to reach your doorstep. Physical kits will probably be out there until the sooner of (a) reaching the 500 kits maximum allotment, or (b) September 30, AI Art - www.solitaryai.art, 2022. After that, you will receive downloadable PDFs along with your customized QR code that you could print out to deliver your child(ren)’s stand to life. Limit one per family / family. Void the place prohibited. US residents only. This content h as be en created by GSA C ontent Gen er at or DE MO.
This story was co-published by The Atlantic and Business Insider. There would seem like no scarcity of issues competing for Mark Zuckerberg’s consideration. Security breaches. Russian disinformation campaigns. Politicians’ demands for more regulation. The measure wouldn’t have an effect on Zuckerberg’s palace in Palo Alto, California, his 700-acre property on the Hawaiian island of Kauai or another home he owns in San Francisco’s hip Dolores Heights. This effort, dubbed Issue 1, is on the ballot in Ohio. Not all Ohioans are comfortable concerning the California billionaires’ involvement. Louis Tobin, the executive director of the Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association, opposes the measure, arguing that fewer folks will enter treatment without the menace of jail time. "We suppose setting criminal justice coverage by constitutional amendment is a terrible concept, and I believe what makes it even worse is that it’s not being proposed by Ohioans. It’s being pushed by money from out of state," Tobin said.
Zuckerberg’s investment in a ballot measure a good distance from residence is hardly distinctive. Liberal billionaire George Soros has given $5 million for issues on the ballot this fall around the nation. California environmentalist Tom Steyer has spent $10 million. All advised, this trio and 22 other American billionaires have invested greater than $70.7 million for initiative campaigns this yr in 19 states the place they do not reside. Meanwhile, as little as $7.2 million has gone from their wallets and people of different billionaires to campaigns in their dwelling states, in response to a Center for Public Integrity analysis of state records. In whole, the $78 million tally from all 34 billionaires - native givers and out-of-state donors alike - may be pocket change to them, however it's more than 10 p.c of the $648 million disclosed so far this 12 months for statewide ballot measure campaigns, as tracked by the nonpartisan political encyclopedia Ballotpedia. This content was written with GSA Content Gen erator Demoversion.
And the full is likely an undercount of billionaires’ affect on this year’s ballot measures. It would not embody gifts from billionaire-led corporations, nor from nonprofits where the billionaires are among a multitude of backers, nor from nonprofits whose donors’ identities are unknown. As with Tobin and the prosecutors association in Ohio, the handouts from the rich to campaigns across state traces rankle some native opponents, even though no one questions their legality. Just who ought to decide points of their states, they ask - the people who dwell there or some rich folks from out-of-state? Other local activists say it’s fine to have billionaires funding ballot initiatives, which let voters determine issues instantly. "There’s nothing illegal about this," said initiative skilled and University of Florida professor Daniel Smith. Indeed, the Supreme Court ruled in 1981 that states cannot restrict contributions to ballot measures partly as a result of measures, unlike candidates, can't be corrupted. Billionaires and ballot measures usually are not a new mixture. Oil trade magnate John D. Rockefeller was behind a 1912 Colorado referendum campaign to remove an eight-hour-most workday for miners.
California software program developer Ron Unz funded a Colorado initiative in 2002 to ban bilingual education. Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg has funded campaigns in California to hike cigarette and soda taxes. "The fact is that you just need some huge cash to even get one of these campaigns off the ground," said Josh Altic, ballot measures mission director for Ballotpedia, adding that the common value for a campaign to get on the ballot in 2016 was more than $1 million. Two rich households who don’t reside in Florida gave millions to a ballot measure there this yr. Five members of the billionaire Bonderman household - four kids of personal equity titan David Bonderman alongside along with his spouse, psychologist Laurie Michaels - contributed $3.2 million to the campaign for a measure that will restore voting rights to felons within the Sunshine State. In addition, hedge fund supervisor James Simons and his daughter Liz Simons gave a combined $1 million to the campaign.