How to File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
A patient who believes that he or she was a victim of a mistake made by a healthcare provider may file a lawsuit for medical malpractice. These cases differ from personal injury lawsuits because they use a professional standard to determine the degree of negligence.
In the United States, malpractice claims are resolved through state trial courts. Each state has its own laws and procedures.
Duty of care
A surgeon, doctor, nurse, or any other health professional, owes their patients a duty of care. This legal concept basically states that any health professional treating you owes a duty to uphold the accepted medical practices, without omission or deviation.
The medical standard of care is the legal yardstick against which all medical malpractice claims are weighed. It is vital for a successful case because it provides a specific method for the injured party and their attorney to establish negligence by proving that a health care professional did not meet the standard of care.
Proving the standard of care often requires the assistance of a medical expert witness. These experts are crucial in setting the standards of care applicable to the particular case, and how the defendants infringed on the standard.
It is also important to prove that the breach of duty caused your injury, illness or death. In medical malpractice claims, damages can include hospital expenses as well as lost income, future earning capacity, suffering, pain, and even punitive damage. Your lawyer must prove the amount of the damages, which could exceed your original medical expenses. In some instances it's easier than in other. In some instances, this is easier than in other situations.
Breach of duty
A physician has a duty to act in accordance with the medical standards of care when delivering services or treatment. When a doctor violates that obligation and causes injury an injured patient can make a claim for malpractice.
Medical negligence can involve an array of actions, including errors in diagnosis, dosage of medications as well as health management, treatment and follow-up care. In order for a lawsuit to be valid, the plaintiff must prove four legal elements. These are:
The first requirement is a doctor-patient relationship. The doctor is required to inform patients about any risks and complications that could arise in the procedure. Failure to do this could cause the physician to be held accountable for malpractice, even if the procedure was carried out perfectly. If the physician did not warn the patient that a particular procedure was likely to have a 30% chance of losing limbs then the patient could not have consented to it.
The other element to be proven is a breach in the standard of care. To prove that the doctor deviated from the norm, the lawyer will need expert witness testimony. It is also necessary to prove that the breach of the standard of care caused the patient's injuries.
The court system can be slow to resolve medical negligence cases. This is due to the fact that it takes a lot of time from both the physician and attorney, in addition to extensive research and interviews with experts and a thorough review of legal and medical literature. A physician who is the subject of an action for malpractice will have to pay high court fees as well as attorney fees and work products, in addition to expenses for expert testimony.
Causation
Doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals are people and they make mistakes. When those mistakes rise to the level of medical malpractice, patients are afflicted with grave and life-altering injuries. It requires both legal and medical expertise to prove that a healthcare provider has breached their in duty that caused injury. A successful case requires four legal elements to be proved such as a relationship between a doctor and patient that is based on the doctor's duty to care towards the patient, the doctor's failure to fulfill that duty, and finally, the injury that resulted from the breach.
It is also necessary to prove that the doctor's departure from the standard of care was the direct and most likely cause of the injury. This element is a higher legal standard than "beyond reasonable doubt" in criminal cases. The plaintiff's attorney must convince the jury or fact-finder that it is more than likely that negligence of the physician caused the injury.
A medical expert is often required early in the process to determine all of these factors. According to Rhode Island law only doctors with the right knowledge, experience and training in the area of the claimed malpractice can provide expert testimony. This is why selecting a competent medical expert is a crucial aspect of the malpractice case.
Damages
A
medical malpractice lawsuit is designed to collect damages, which comprise the future and past expenses resulting from an injury. These costs could include hospital bills, doctor's appointments, pain and discomfort, and lost wages. The amount of damages awarded is determined by the jury according to the evidence that is presented.
During the trial, the plaintiff or their attorney must prove four key legal elements: (1) a physician owed them a professional duty; (2) the doctor breached this duty by acting negligently; (3) the doctor's negligence caused injury; and (4) the injury resulted in measurable damages. Discontent with a doctor's work isn't a cause of negligence, but a real injury has to be evidenced.
medical malpractice law firm experts can help determine whether a doctor has strayed from the norm of care.
The legal process for a malpractice case can last years. This is because "discovery" involves the exchange of documents and the sworn statements of the parties involved. While many cases settle before reaching the courtroom, only a few of these claims will go all through to a jury trial and verdict.
To limit liability for malpractice Certain states have taken a number legislative and administrative measures collectively referred to as tort reform. In addition, some states have implemented alternative dispute resolution schemes such as binding arbitration on a voluntary basis. These alternatives to civil litigation are designed to lower the cost of litigation, speed up settlement and handling of malpractice claims, reduce the number of generous juries, and screen out frivolous claims.