0 votes
by (1.7k points)

Richard Curtis film made at the zenith of his powers as a filmmaker. It's a film about uniting people with love, premiering at a time of tremendous divisions on both sides of the Atlantic. From 9/11 to the wars in the Middle East to the economy, it was a time of uncertainty. Love, as the movie finds, actually, is all around us. Still, the many plot threads of the film are quite different from each other, and no two fans of the film love quite the same ones. In fact, though some may love "Love Actually," they may, at the same time, not like one or more of the characters, tolerating one plotline for the sake of one or more of the others. Do these preferences say something more profound about the people who hold them? Do they correlate with other qualities one could easily discern? Can we, with careful consideration, suss out which plotline within "Love Actually" is the one that tugs at your heartstrings?


Put our wits to the test with this quiz! Sure, male masturbator movie cliches can make your eyes roll, but there's a reason they pop up so often. Which one do you secretly love? Yes, but one should close the gap as quickly as possible. No, male masturbator but I wouldn't frown on someone else's relationship. Besides "Love Actually," which of these rom-coms would you watch right now if you could? I don't know because I have no class! I suppose one small hop. Any chasm can be crossed with love. I wouldn't know because I've never tried. Anyone, I'm not picky. I just want someone I can really talk to. It turns out I met them decades ago and just didn't realize it. I thought I had, but I was wrong. Yes! What drink are you reaching for to warm up? Throwing a surprise party for your loved one. Serenading the one you love in public. Being sincere about one's feelings in front of the family. I don't go for grand gestures. Which one speaks to you? Which would you interpret as a sign of love? There's no place like home. The spirit of the holidays moved me. I knew I wanted them to be my family. I wanted to be honest. I haven't found that special someone yet. Which one of these always gets you? What song's up first? If you HAD to cut one storyline from "Love Actually," which would you leave on the cutting room floor? What's your least favorite part? No, but it's hard for me to sort them out. Awkwardness isn't in my vocabulary. Which of these do you like most? I find that difficult to muster. I feel very uncomfortable with it. A very weird person!

Post w​as g ener​at ed with t he help of GSA Con tent Generat or  Demov ersion.


The Diocese of Sion (Latin: Dioecesis Sedunensis, French: Diocèse de Sion, German: Bistum Sitten) is a Catholic ecclesiastical territory in the canton of Valais, male masturbator Switzerland. It is the oldest bishopric in the country and one of the oldest north of the Alps. The history of the Bishops of Sion, of the Abbey of St. Maurice of Valais as a whole are inextricably intertwined. The see was established at Octodurum, now called Martigny, the capital of the Roman province of Alpes Poeninae. The first authentically historical bishop was Saint Theodore/Theodolus (died in 391), who was present at the Council of Aquileia in 381. He founded the Abbey of Saint-Maurice, with a small church in honor of Saint Maurice, martyred there c. 300, when he united the local hermits in a common life, thus beginning the Abbey of Saint-Maurice, the oldest north of the Alps. Theodore rebuilt the church at Sion, which had been destroyed by Emperor Maximinus at the beginning of the 4th century.


At first the new diocese was a suffragan of the archdiocese of Vienne; later it became suffragan of Tarentaise. In 589 the bishop, St. Heliodorus, transferred the see to Sion, leaving the low-lying, flood-prone site of Octodurum, where the Drance joins the Rhone. Though frequently the early bishops were also abbots of Saint-Maurice, the monastic community was jealously watchful that the bishops should not extend their jurisdiction over the abbey. About 999, the last king of Upper Burgundy, Rudolph III, granted the Countship of Valais to Bishop Hugo (998-1017); this union of the spiritual and secular powers made the prince-bishop the most powerful ruler in the valley of the Upper Rhone, the region called the Valais. Taking this donation as a basis, the bishops of Sion extended their secular power, and the religious metropolis of the valley became also the political centre. However, the union of the two powers was the cause of violent disputes in the following centuries.

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Welcome to FluencyCheck, where you can ask language questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...