Next to options like Bitcoin Era, Binance might as well be impeccable because it’s more trustworthy and versatile. Learn more about the CLI. The best way to do so would be to lift this Script to a more user-friendly format such as a MiniScript Policy display, but anything would be better than an "address". Problem: A typical HW today would display the "destination" of a transaction in the form of a bitcoin address. The correct usage would be for a user to verify this address on a third device (mobile phone, for example). The postulate we start from is that Hardware Wallets (HW) are useful to mitigate the compromission of the day-to-day device of a user. Hello everyone, I would like to start a discussion on improving Hardware Wallets. This email discusses improvements that would benefit everyone, and some that are more suitable for "layer 2" or pre- signed transactions protocols. Like all digital currencies and platforms that try to keep transactions to be used across the Internet anonymous, Bitcoins, too, have disadvantages such as online theft and hacking, criminal uses and volatility. One of the things people sometimes claim about bitcoin as an asset, is that it's got both the advantage of having been first to market, but also that if some altcoin comes along with great new ideas, then those ideas can just be incorporated into bitcoin too, so bitcoin can preserve it's lead even from innovators.
>
While I mainly foresee issues/improvements that may affect Revault, I would be really happy to see people joining this thread with any other ideas and remarks that would benefit some parts of Bitcoin that I overlooked. While cryptocurrency exchanges promise to treat users' private information with care, https://youtu.be/Ds0iyA71Jr4 many people who prefer to maintain anonymity don't want to take that chance. 60. The Conspirators used several dedicated email accounts to track basic bitcoin transaction information and to facilitate bitcoin payments to vendors. They mainly prevent private-key extraction today, and aren't very suitable against an attack on the transaction being signed, as explained further. Combine it with your idea of committing to a max-number-of-operations (which increases the weight of the transaction) and you may very well have something viable. The underlying technology - the blockchain, can do things that we have never seen before. It seems to end up equivalent to doing things in a list oriented way to me. You could also allow things to be pushed onto the stack that (recursively) can push things onto the stack -- the language "Joy" takes this approach. One approach is to just define a new version of the language via the tapleaf version, defining new opcodes however we like.
>
To me, it seems like chia lisp is a better answer to the problem here than the Simplicity language. If we were to adopt this, obviously we shouldn't call it "chia lisp" anymore, since it wouldn't work the same in important ways. I heartily endorse LISP --- it has a trivial implementation of `eval` that is easily implementable once you have defined a proper data type in preferred-language-here to represent LISP datums. DROP` will have similar behavior when allocated at the nursery. Since the GC nursery acts as a large buffer of potential allocations, the amount of work done in both cases would be the same, at least until the number of allocs exceeds the nursery size. This would mean also being able to pull information about the utxo being spent to obtain its amount and scriptpubkey, which are committed to wit ANYPREVOUT. DROP` is just a refcount decrement, and the amount of memory used remains small. Secondly we have a manual hack pack and you can see how it works from the first video above or follow this link to watch video. We have heard from wallet providers that a reason for their hesitation to default to receiving to bech32 addresses is concern that they’d see a significant increase in customer support requests.</<br>r>
See spot-client.ts for further information. This is where the 2-3x factor speed advantage comes from. In the contract of cryptocurrency loans, the borrowers are individuals and agree on a personal capacity, not such an organization like banks, etc. The lenders who hold the assets can invest anywhere till the maturity time and earn profit and benefits etc. Of course, the risk factor is always involved in this. Of course, "defun" and "if" aren't listed as opcodes above; instead you have a compiler that gives you nice macros like defun and translates them into correct uses of the "a" opcode, etc. As I understand it, those sort of macros and translations are pretty well understood across lisp-like languages, and, of course, they're already implemented for chia lisp. This takes advantage of LN’s Tor-like onion routing by allowing a spender to choose a preimage, encrypt it so that only the receiver’s node can decrypt it, and then route a payment along LN like normal using the hash of the preimage. Of note is that the supposed "problem at scale" of LISP is, as I understand it, due precisely to its code and data being homoiconic to each other.